Rule of Law, Justice, and Interpretation
- Publisher
- McGill-Queen's University Press
- Initial publish date
- Oct 1997
- Category
- Jurisprudence, Constitutional
-
eBook
- ISBN
- 9780773566910
- Publish Date
- Oct 1997
- List Price
- $110.00
Add it to your shelf
Where to buy it
Description
Tremblay's theory of the rule of law involves a set of practical principles that constitute the ideal type of a conception of law that is both constitutive and regulative of legal discourse and practice. Tremblay examines two competing ideal types, the "rule of law as certainty" and the "rule of law as justice." The former, a standard doctrine within contemporary legal, social, and political theory, is shown to be incoherent. Thus the "rule of law as justice," he shows, provides the best basis for understanding legal discourse in general and Canadian constitutional law in particular. Tremblay offers a coherent reconstruction of Canadian law from fundamental principles of the rule of law as justice and tests the theory through applications to key judicial decisions that have proven resistant to positivist interpretation. The Rule of Law, Justice, and Interpretation is both a stimulating work of contemporary legal theory and an innovative challenge to the traditions of Canadian constitutional law. Tremblay examines fundamental issues of legal epistemology and ontology and brings rigorous analytical jurisprudence to bear on interpretations and applications specific to Canadian constitutional law. Given the important implications of his theory for statutory and constitutional interpretation, especially with respect to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the potential crisis involving provincial rights of secession and partition, this book will be central to the practice of law in Canada.
About the author
Editorial Reviews
"A fresh and interesting analysis of the concept of the rule of law and the implications for the Canadian legal system since 1982. The Rule of Law, Justice, and Interpretation starts a new phase of Charter interpretation by challenging prevailing doctrines of Charter and constitutional interpretation and suggesting that the ultimate rule of justification of our law is not in fact the Constitution but the very concept of the rule of law." Armand de Mestral, Faculty of Law, McGill University