The idea of a wicked legal system, one whose laws have been made the instrument of a repugnant moral ideology, continues to play an important part in philosophical debates about the nature of law and law's claim to moral authority. It seems to offer support for the argument of legal positivists, who insist on a clear conceptual distinction between legal requirements, deriving from social sources, and moral requirements. Does the existence of wicked legal systems present an insurmountable obstacle to critics of positivism who reject the importance of that distinction?

The abstract debates of legal philosophers can seem far removed from the practical application of law in the business of deciding cases. This book argues that theoretical disagreement matters profoundly to the practice of law, and analyses the abstract debates of legal philosophy through a detailed study of judicial interpretations in apartheid South Africa - a model 'wicked legal system'. The case study shows that particular conceptions of law and of the rule of law determined the reasoning both of judges whose decisions supported official policy and of judges whose decisions resisted that policy.

The first edition of this book was published in 1991. Since then South Africa has transformed, and the major debates in legal theory have shifted from analysing the concept of law itself to analysing the concept of legality and the value of the rule of law. For this substantially revised new edition, the author addresses the transformation of South Africa since the end of Apartheid, and the shift in focus of legal philosophy. He also examines the emergence of counter-terrorism security laws, and the arguments surrounding their conformity to the rule of law. The book offers an invaluable guide to understanding the abstract debates of legal theory, and their importance in legal practice.

David Dyzenhaus is a professor in the Faculty of Law and the Department of Philosophy at the University of Toronto.

David Dyzenhaus' profile page

"a clear jurisprudential model that ...is capable of promoting vigorous debate"

--Dennis Davis, South African Law Journal

"carries the debate about the relationship between law and morality into new territory in ways that are insightful and instructive, not only because of its case study of the South African legal system but also because it makes a significant connection with the tradition of political philosophy which other legal theorists have largely ignored."

--William Hughes, Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 1992

"a rich resource for its illuminating discussions of the styles of judicial reasoning that South African judges brought to the apartheid laws"

--Leslie Green, American Political Science Review, 1994

Review from previous edition: "As legal history, the book is written with passion and with care, and its importance is clear. The book also has great importance as a work of legal philosophy"

--Roger Shiner, Ratio Juris, (1994)