Skip to main content Skip to search Skip to search

Language Arts & Disciplines General

Aspects of Split Ergativity

by (author) Jessica Coon

Publisher
Oxford University Press
Initial publish date
Sep 2013
Category
General
  • Paperback / softback

    ISBN
    9780199858736
    Publish Date
    Aug 2013
    List Price
    $66.00
  • Hardback

    ISBN
    9780199858743
    Publish Date
    Sep 2013
    List Price
    $108.95

Add it to your shelf

Where to buy it

Description

In languages with aspect-based split ergativity, one portion of the grammar follows an ergative pattern, while another shows a "split." In this book, Jessica Coon argues that aspectual split ergativity does not mark a split in how case is assigned, but rather, a split in sentence structure. Specifically, the contexts in which we find the appearance of a nonergative pattern in an otherwise ergative language involve added structure - a disassociation between the syntactic predicate and the stem carrying the lexical verb stem.

The book begins with an analysis of split person marking patterns in Chol, a Mayan language of southern Mexico. Here appearance of split ergativity follows naturally from the fact that the progressive and the imperfective morphemes are verbs, while the perfective morpheme is not. The fact that the nonperfective morphemes are verbs, combined with independent properties of Chol grammar, results in the appearance of a split.

This book further surveys aspectual splits in a variety of unrelated languages and offers an explanation for the universal directionality of split ergativity: in splits, ergativity is always retained in the perfective aspect. Following Laka's (2006) proposal for Basque, Coon proposes that the cross-linguistic tendency for imperfective aspects to pattern with locative constructions is responsible for the biclausality which causes the appearance of a nonergative pattern. Building on Demirdache and Uribe-Etxebarria's (2000) prepositional account of spatiotemporal relations, Coon proposes that the perfective is never periphrastic - and thus never involves a split - because there is no preposition in natural language that correctly captures the relation of the assertion time to the event time denoted by the perfective aspect.

About the author

Contributor Notes

Jessica Coon is Assistant Professor of Linguistics at McGill University. She completed her PhD at MIT in 2010 and spent one year as a post-doc at Harvard before accepting a SSHRC Banting Post-doctoral Research Fellowship at McGill University. She joined the faculty at McGill in 2011. Her work focuses on the morphology and syntax of under-documented languages. She has more than a decade of experience working on languages of the Mayan family.

Other titles by