On a book page, this tab will allow you to add a book to one of your lists.
Please login or register to use this feature.
9780262035125_cover Enlarge Cover
0 of 5
0 ratings
rated!
rated!
list price: $26.00 USD
edition:Hardcover
category: Education
published: Oct 2016
ISBN:9780262035125
publisher: The MIT Press

Bibliometrics and Research Evaluation

Uses and Abuses

by Yves Gingras

reviews: 0
tagged:
add a tag
Please login or register to use this feature.
evaluation
0 of 5
0 ratings
rated!
rated!
list price: $26.00 USD
edition:Hardcover
category: Education
published: Oct 2016
ISBN:9780262035125
publisher: The MIT Press
Description

Why bibliometrics is useful for understanding the global dynamics of science but generate perverse effects when applied inappropriately in research evaluation and university rankings.

The research evaluation market is booming. “Ranking,” “metrics,” “h-index,” and “impact factors” are reigning buzzwords. Government and research administrators want to evaluate everything—teachers, professors, training programs, universities—using quantitative indicators. Among the tools used to measure “research excellence,” bibliometrics—aggregate data on publications and citations—has become dominant. Bibliometrics is hailed as an “objective” measure of research quality, a quantitative measure more useful than “subjective” and intuitive evaluation methods such as peer review that have been used since scientific papers were first published in the seventeenth century. In this book, Yves Gingras offers a spirited argument against an unquestioning reliance on bibliometrics as an indicator of research quality. Gingras shows that bibliometric rankings have no real scientific validity, rarely measuring what they pretend to.

Although the study of publication and citation patterns, at the proper scales, can yield insights on the global dynamics of science over time, ill-defined quantitative indicators often generate perverse and unintended effects on the direction of research. Moreover, abuse of bibliometrics occurs when data is manipulated to boost rankings. Gingras looks at the politics of evaluation and argues that using numbers can be a way to control scientists and diminish their autonomy in the evaluation process. Proposing precise criteria for establishing the validity of indicators at a given scale of analysis, Gingras questions why universities are so eager to let invalid indicators influence their research strategy.

About the Author
Yves Gingras is Professor and Canada Research Chair in History and Sociology of Science, Department of History, at Université du Québec à Montréal.
Author profile page >
Editorial Review

...this is a great first read for anyone new to bibliometrics, and a great resource to anyone established in the field.

The Bibliomagician

Buy the e-book:

X
Contacting facebook
Please wait...