We’re thrilled to once again work in partnership with our friends at the Griffin Poetry Prize to bring you a special roundtable edition of The Chat with all three 2019 Canadian Griffin Prize finalists.
Dionne Brand is a finalist for The Blue Clerk (McClelland & Stewart). The jury citation reads: “Dionne Brand’s The Blue Clerk is many things at once: a book-length ars poetica; an act of memo
ry and reconfiguration; an extended meditation (one that moves at times directly, at others by a kind of philosophical osmosis) touching on the realms of history, politics, race and gender; an internal, consciously curated and interrogated dialogue that manages to create a space for all of these. Expansive, beautifully written, structurally compelling, and above all moving, The Blue Clerk is a book to be read (and re-read), not just for the pleasures of its language, but for the breadth of its vision, and the capaciousness of its thinking.”
Eve Joseph’s collection Quarrels (Anvil) is also a finalist. The jury citation reads: “In Quarrels, Eve Joseph’s delightful collection of prose poems, you enter the marvellous and that is the truth! The poet has surrendered herself to the realm of the illogical, trusting that it has a logic of its own, and the outcome is, indeed, a new music. These poems are intriguing spaces and moments defeating the boundaries of the real, but rest assured, Joseph leads you by the hand with warmth, wit and empathy.
Perhaps these poems are crystallisations of a deeply human, spiritual knowledge, gathered over decades working in a hospice. Joseph’s previous book, the exceptional memoir, In the Slender Margin, renders this experience. Certainly, without gravity, poems wouldn’t be able to sing. As distillations of life, these poems, with beauty and charm, hold their own credibility: an omnipresent, merely-in-glimpses-tangible marvelousness, miraculously fastened to the pages of a single slender volume that will fit into most pockets and assure magnificent company on any given journey.”
Finally, Sarah Tolmie’s The Art of Dying (McGill-Queen’s University Press) is the third finalist. The jury citation reads: “A modern danse macabre in eighty-nine parts, Sarah Tolmie’s The Art of Dying conceals a multifaceted meditation on mortality beneath its deceptively simple lyric surface. An irreverent feminist in the tradition of Dorothy Parker and Stevie Smith, Tolmie leverages the subversive possibilities of doggerel to upend our assumptions about everything from abortion to the Anthropocene. Wickedly funny, this is work of great intimacy, too, introducing us to a mother, concerned citizen, social media addict, bookworm, and bon vivant who wants nothing more than to remain ‘Here on the quiet earth that I still love, / Where the last humans are.’”
**
THE CHAT WITH DIONNE BRAND, EVE JOSEPH, AND SARAH TOLMIE
What was the first thing you did when you found out you were a finalist for the 2019 Griffin Prize?
Dionne Brand: I thanked the Blue Clerk.
Eve Joseph: I woke up that morning with the recurring belief that my writing life was over. My husband, also a writer, takes these things in stride and suggested that I could become a dog walker. When I opened my emails, a whack of them had congratulations in the heading. I clicked on one, saw my name and “Griffin nomination” beside it, shut down the computer and went to the gym. Totally stunned, didn’t read any of them till later. I was completely overwhelmed and then thrilled.
Sarah Tolmie: My husband yelled up the stairs at about 7:30 a.m., “You’d better see this RIGHT NOW!” I assumed it was a plumbing problem. He brought up his computer—his inbox was filling up with congratulations he was supposed to pass on—and showed me a Globe headline someone had forwarded. I was dumbfounded. The first thing I said was, “I’ll have to get my hair cut.”
Can you talk about a poem or a particular passage in the work you found especially challenging?
DB: The whole book was challenging. All of it was contentious. It required acute levels of honesty and clarity. To remain at those levels made me want to give up at every turn.
EJ: The poems in the first section of the book were both challenging and rewarding to write. I was interested in the intersection between the real and the unreal, between fact and fiction; in how, if we scratch the surface of the ordinary, the extraordinary is often just beneath it. The challenge was to let go of logic and narrative and create space for the strange and peculiar without just making things up. The more I worked with these poems, the more I was drawn to the surreal and illogical, to the boundary where the contradictory impulses of prose and poetry collide and something new becomes possible. I still don’t feel as if I have mastered the form.
ST: These poems came fairly easily, once I trusted myself enough to just let them be funny. Humour is a shibboleth in serious poetry, something you dance around with great care. Always a risk. Many high-minded readers don’t like it.
In recent years, discussions around power and privilege are at the forefront of many important conversations in Canadian literature. How can poetry speak back to power differently than other forms of art?
DB: Adrienne Rich said that poetry is the least commoditized art. That alone allows it to stay outside of certain regimes of power, but there are also regimes of power within literary forms, which coincide or synchronize with relations of ruling. But the beauty of poetry is its always-contested terrain, its always-upheavals so these literary regimes don't last very long but are undermined and under cut by poetry’s itinerancy and its unofficial economy.
EJ: Poetry can cut through reason and rhetoric and reach us with an immediacy that speaks directly to our humanity. The key, for me, is that imagery touches us intellectually and emotionally in an instant. It is in that instantaneous flare of recognition that one can experience a shift in perception and a sense of sudden liberation. Poetry introduces us to voices we have not heard before and challenges our tired assumptions. From its earliest beginnings, poetry has acted as witness. It holds memory and has a history of resistance as evidenced by writers such as Nazim Hikmet, Anna Akhmatova, Pablo Neruda, Joy Harjo and many others. It affords us the opportunity to see the familiar in new, unsettling ways and it does so—not through overt political rhetoric—but by filtering experience through the lens of ordinary life.
Comments here
comments powered by Disqus