This first full-length study of renunication in Sankara's Advaita Vedanta shows that Sankara's position has been misinterpreted by both traditional and modern commentators and brings his actual position to light.

This book is the first full-length study of renunciation in “a—kara's Advaita Ved—nta. It shows that a major misinterpretation occurred concerning “a—kara's position on renunciation early within his own tradition, and has persisted amongst modern Indologists. Most interpreters of “a—kara understand that he saw the monastic way of living as a sine qua non for full knowledge of the Self and spiritual freedom. But this study brings “a—kara's real position to light and shows that, for him, inner renunciation of ego and doership was the only indispensable form of renunciation. Monasticism was quite useful, but not mandatory. Using “a—kara's own hermeneutical principles as well as the modern philological approach, Marcaurelle shows the basic processes of interpretation and misinterpretation that can shape fundamental aspects of a spiritual tradition.

Included with the work is a discussion of particular interest given the world-wide revival of Eastern forms of meditation: a clarification of “a—kara's view of the value of meditation.

Roger Marcaurelle's profile page

Roger Marcaurelle is Lecturer, Department of Religious Studies, Universite du Quebec a Montreal.

"This is an outstanding piece of scholarship. The author shows a deep understanding of Sankara's thought." — John M. Koller, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

"?Marcaurelle's—treatment of the material is exhaustive, extending over the entire corpus of Sankara's authentic writings; his analyses of individual passages are meticulous and balanced — [The study's] focus — accounts for a satisfying density and rigor of argumentation." — Journal of the American Oriental Society

"The most remarkable thing about the book is the author's thorough command of Advaita literature coupled with a passionate, keen, and persistent concentration on his thesis. In this he emulates Sankaracarya, the greatest of all Advaitins. The intellectual importance of the book lies in the combination of scholarly expertise and persistence that the author brings to his task." — Karl H. Potter, University of Washington