Skip to main content Skip to search Skip to search

Philosophy Epistemology

Kant's Empirical Realism

by (author) Paul Abela

Publisher
Oxford University Press
Initial publish date
Jan 2002
Category
Epistemology
  • Hardback

    ISBN
    9780199242740
    Publish Date
    Jan 2002
    List Price
    $249.00

Add it to your shelf

Where to buy it

Description

Kant claims that Transcendental Idealism yields a form of realism at the empirical level. Polite silence might best describe the reception this assertion has garnered among even sympathetic interpreters.

aul Abela challenges that prejudice, offering a presentation and rehabilitation of Kant's Empirical Realism that places Kant's realist credentials at the centre of the account of representation he offers in the Critique of Pure Reason. Abela's innovative interpretation ranges over the major themes contained in the Analytic of Principles and relevant portions of the Dialectic. Kant's analysis of the conditions necessary for determinate representation is shown to involve a realist understanding of the relation of mind and world. The realist character of Kant's account of empirical truth, and his commitment to the unity of nature, are defended against competing empiricist, pragmatist, and methodological readings. Kant's Empirical Realism will appeal to scholars and students of Kant in addition to epistemologists, metaphysicians, and philosophers of science interested in a powerful, experience-sensitive, form of realism.

About the author

Contributor Notes

Paul Abela is Associate Professor of Philosophy at Acadia University, Nova Scotia.

Editorial Reviews

'This book provides plenty of food for thought for anyone concerned with placing Kant within the contemporary debates on realism and anti-realism and presents a compelling reason for placing him on the side of realism ... In arguing for a systematic realist account of Kant, Abela re-opens the fundamental questions of the unity of reason and the unity of Kant's system, questions that have been kept off the Anglo-American philosophical agenda for too long.' British Journal for the History of Philosophy